Poller v. Bioscrip, Inc., 2013 WL 5354753 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013)

Poller v. Bioscrip, Inc., 2013 WL 5354753 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013)

“No language in the CFAA supports [the] argument that authorization to use
a computer ceases when an employee resolves to use the computer contrary to the employer’s interest,” so long as that individual still technically possesses the right of computer access pursuant to his employ. In other words, exploitative or disloyal access to an employer’s computer will not render otherwise permissible access unauthorized within the CFAA’s meaning.