Poller v. Bioscrip, Inc., 2013 WL 5354753 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013)

Poller v. Bioscrip, Inc., 2013 WL 5354753 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013)CFAAdigest

“No language in the CFAA supports [the] argument that authorization to use
a computer ceases when an employee resolves to use the computer contrary to the employer’s interest,” so long as that individual still technically possesses the right of computer access pursuant to his employ. In other words, exploitative or disloyal access to an employer’s computer will not render otherwise permissible access unauthorized within the CFAA’s meaning.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s