Sixth Circuit: Unknown Access of a Remote Server Cannot Be Intentional, Thus Does Not Violate CFAA

©2011 Braydon Fuller
©2011 Braydon Fuller

Does a person violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by accessing a remote computer without authorization if he is not aware that he is even accessing that remote computer?

The Sixth Circuit says no. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act prohibits the intentional access of a computer without authorization. When a defendant is not aware that he is accessing a computer remotely, he cannot be said to be accessing it intentionally. Thus, he cannot be violating the CFAA. 

This was the issue addressed by the Sixth Circuit in Dice Corporation v. Bold Technologies, 12-2513, 13-1712 (6th Cir. Jan. 24, 2014). You can read a complete analysis of the case on the CFAAdigest.

Published by Shawn E. Tuma

Shawn Tuma is an attorney who is internationally recognized in cybersecurity, computer fraud and data privacy law, areas in which he has practiced for nearly two decades. He is a Partner at Spencer Fane, LLP where he regularly serves as outside cybersecurity and privacy counsel to a wide range of companies from small to midsized businesses to Fortune 100 enterprises. You can reach Shawn by telephone at 972.324.0317 or email him at stuma@spencerfane.com.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Business Cyber Risk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading