“The Streisand Effect Gone Bonkers” – trying to use copyright to silence online reviews backfired

dentist 牙医的黑暗魔法

A New York dentist had her patients sign a “mutual” agreement that, among other things, had the patient agree to not make any negative reviews of the dentist and, if she did, assigned the copyright of those reviews to the dentist. The reason for this was so, if the patient violated the agreement and made any negative reviews, the dentist could rely on her assigned copyright to send a DMCA Takedown Notice to the website host and circumvent the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which generally immunizes such hosts.

Well, as things always go, a patient did post a negative online review on Yelp and the dentist sent a DMCA Takedown Notice to Yelp. It all went downhill for the dentist from there. For someone trying to keep negative publicity to a minimum, this was the wrong move — what was described as “the Streisand Effect Gone Bonkers.”

You can read more at the following link but, long story short, if you have a contract like this, rather than try and enforce it, you’d probably be better off to just shred it and never tell anyone!

Dentist who used copyright to silence her patients is on the run | Ars Technica.

Published by Shawn E. Tuma

Shawn Tuma is an attorney who is internationally recognized in cybersecurity, computer fraud and data privacy law, areas in which he has practiced for nearly two decades. He is a Partner at Spencer Fane, LLP where he regularly serves as outside cybersecurity and privacy counsel to a wide range of companies from small to midsized businesses to Fortune 100 enterprises. You can reach Shawn by telephone at 972.324.0317 or email him at stuma@spencerfane.com.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Business Cyber Risk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading