Danois v. i3 Archive Inc., 2013 WL 3556083 (E.D. Pa. July 12, 2013)

Danois v. i3 Archive Inc., 2013 WL 3556083 (E.D. Pa. July 12, 2013)CFAAdigest

Employer sued employee for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act premised on the allegation that, after termination of his employment, employee deleted emails from his own and another terminated employee’s email accounts. Employer, however, was able to easily restore all, or at least substantially all, of the deleted emails.

Employee filed a motion for summary judgment on whether the predicate $5,000 loss requirement was satisfied. Employer argued that the process of restoring the emails took two full days and prevented the system engineer doing the restoration from furthering the company’s business at that critical juncture in the company’s history. The court found this was inadequate and Employer failed to offer any evidence to establish the $5,000 loss and granted summary judgment.

Published by Shawn E. Tuma

Shawn Tuma is an attorney who is internationally recognized in cybersecurity, computer fraud and data privacy law, areas in which he has practiced for nearly two decades. He is a Partner at Spencer Fane, LLP where he regularly serves as outside cybersecurity and privacy counsel to a wide range of companies from small to midsized businesses to Fortune 100 enterprises. You can reach Shawn by telephone at 972.324.0317 or email him at stuma@spencerfane.com.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Business Cyber Risk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading