Two federal district courts in Texas have faced this issue and both refused to find that plaintiffs, to assert a civil Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim, must meet the $5,000 loss threshold separately as to each defendant.
Regular readers of this blog know I often write about the $5,000 jurisdictional loss requirement for asserting a civil claim under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Its importance is demonstrated by the many legitimate CFAA claims that have been dismissed because the jurisdictional loss requirement was not satisfied even though it possibly could have been with a little better strategic planning from the outset.
The statutory language of section 1030(g) of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act provides that multiple plaintiffs can aggregate their losses to meet the jurisdictional threshold. But, does that mean that the plaintiffs must have a separate $5,000 loss for each defendant? The statutory language of the CFAA does not explicitly answer this question.
Two Federal district courts in Texas have recently faced this issue–in the same case. Neither court found there must be a separate $5,000 loss for each defendant in the lawsuit. The defendants in the case M-1 LLC v. Argus Green LLC, 2011 WL 3813286 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2011), have raised this issue before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas as well as the court rendering this opinion, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (case transferred from the former). The Eastern District Court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs were not required to have a separate $5,000 loss for each defendant. The Southern District Court, in this opinion, refused to disturb the ruling in the absence of compelling proof that it should.
At least these two federal district courts in Texas have refused to find that plaintiffs, to assert a civil Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim, must meet the $5,000 loss threshold separately as to each defendant. Given what we know about the unpredictability of the CFAA, whether others courts will find the same way remains to be seen.
Related articles
- Can you get your attorneys’ fees under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? (shawnetuma.com)
- Can stealing a CAR violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? (shawnetuma.com)
- Minimizing the risk of employee data breach and privacy mischief in the cloud (shawnetuma.com)
- “What Does CFAA Mean and Why Should I Care?” – A Primer on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for Civil Litigators (shawnetuma.com)
- comScore Lawsuit and that Pesky Loss Requirement of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (shawnetuma.com)
Leave a comment